Warning:
JavaScript is turned OFF. None of the links on this page will work until it is reactivated.
If you need help turning JavaScript On, click here.
The Concept Map you are trying to access has information related to:
goldfarb_kripke_wittgenstein_rules, agreement BUT how is it to decide, if others agree?, What is the right interpretation? What rule to follow? but can the RIGHT interpretation at all be reached - is not already to speak of 'right' turning in the circle?, community uses agreement, past utterances and performances that means What is the right interpretation? What rule to follow?, agreement Zemach follows then sentences have neither meaning nor truth conditions, but only assertability conditions: one is justified if others say "i agree" under these circumstances", What is the right interpretation? What rule to follow? with community, checkability Zemach follows then sentences have neither meaning nor truth conditions, but only assertability conditions: one is justified if others say "i agree" under these circumstances", interpretations is ascription of meaning, how is it to decide, if others agree? for that we need truth conditions of 'x and y agree', otherwise we cannot say if they agree, agreement BUT What is Kripke communicating speaking about 'agreement', etc., do we have to agree with him, or is he referring to their meaning?