Warning:
JavaScript is turned OFF. None of the links on this page will work until it is reactivated.
If you need help turning JavaScript On, click here.
The Concept Map you are trying to access has information related to:
Moral Philosophy, NO! They don't Nihilism, Non-Naturalism proposes Good cannot be defined in terms of any natural phenomena such as pleasure, Do They? Sceptism, Yes! Objective Moral Properties EXIST! Realism, Moral judgements are expressions of emotion or preference eg "X is good" really means "Hurrah for X!" See Emotivism link:, Moral Philosophy I Miner (2006) Meta-Ethical Perspectives (Are there objective moral properties, such as "good" "bad"?) NO! They don't, no single true morality See Online Guide: eg morals are social conventions, Moral Philosophy I Miner (2006) Meta-Ethical Perspectives (Are there objective moral properties, such as "good" "bad"?) Yes! Objective Moral Properties EXIST!, Yes! Objective Moral Properties EXIST! Naturalism, Good cannot be defined in terms of any natural phenomena such as pleasure eg cannot be reduced to needs/wants/pleasures. Cannot be explained in other words: "good" is only "good" (whereas "brother" can be explained as "male sibling"). Being "good" is not the same as being pleasurable or wanted, or needed.. see link