Warning:
JavaScript is turned OFF. None of the links on this page will work until it is reactivated.
If you need help turning JavaScript On, click here.
The Concept Map you are trying to access has information related to:
pete, indecent material, however, may be restricted in order to avoid its broadcast during times of the day when there is a reasonable risk that children may be in the audience, one must be careful and know whom they�re attempting to pull a prank on, dangers, such as death threats, indecent material, and bomb making information show why freedom of speech can be harmful to our society, someone who takes offense to it may try to come after person who pulled prank or wrote a threat to them, there is evidence that bomb information that can be accessed through the internet has been connected to terrorist acts. , pornography perhaps is the most prevalent way, indecent programming contains patently offensive sexual or excretory references that do not rise to the level of obscenity, bad things can happen , it is almost as if our own constitution has given terrorists the right to spread their ideas through freedom of speech., freedom of speech, not all speech is protected under 1st amendment'sfreedom of speech, death threats are not protected speech and may therefore be prosecuted under appropriate laws., some people (children, teenagers) think 1st amendment guarantees right to say anything with no consequences, person may want to turn in the pranker to local authorities for making a death threat, bibliography, specific activity, dangers, such as death threats, indecent material, and bomb making information show why freedom of speech can be harmful to our society., what exactly is indecent material?, problem presented, necessary for safeguarding democracy, growing as a nation, and respect of human dignity, indecent material is shown on the internet in several ways, the internet has often been the source of problems, given that restrictions are imposed to limit access to indecent material, people must still be cognizant that it is out there and very much accessible to anyone, including children, as such, the courts have held that indecent material is protected by the first amendment and cannot be banned entirely, freedom of speech should be carefully examined, for information on how to make bombs, any member of the public who desires such information can readily obtain it, recent law enforcement experience demonstrates that persons who attempt or plan acts of terrorism often possess literature that describes the construction of explosive devices and other weapons of mass destruction (including biological weapons)., heavily debated issue, perhaps with a thorough examination of how exactly the first amendment is worded, it could be re-worded so that death threats, indecent material, and bomb information will be outlawed. if that were to happen it would be for the good of the people, not only in the u.s., but worldwide.