Warning:
JavaScript is turned OFF. None of the links on this page will work until it is reactivated.
If you need help turning JavaScript On, click here.
The Concept Map you are trying to access has information related to:
future spec, workflows services tools QA roles describe this isn't this a reference model issue - isn't this part of that already??, range of questions it can cope with structured questions david nichol chapter on objective testing using prs system, future spec/guidelines qti range of questions it can cope with, range of questions it can cope with structured questions concern about excluding science and geog - should they go down the subjective format should we be trying to handle the objective COLA projects wanted to go down objective route, future spec/guidelines ???? CLIVE -do we just need to broaden the community - consistency of use strength of community and confidence TOIA community concept didn't work - timing people didn't offer content for sharing - lack of support mist re interoperability qti - and item banking two sep areas manageable community in He - subject centres - subject approach smaller acheivable level, range of questions it can cope with structured questions MCQ concern - seen as easy option encourage community to try other forms wilbert - work in ND around peer assessment another model, range of questions it can cope with structured questions validating questions in a pedagogic sense subject centres subject split, eframework - bringing together e-portfolio and eassment. connections between ref models and other models ???? one workflow model from Peter rees Jones, range of questions it can cope with structured questions do we need more content? not made here systems not the content content as illustration exemplar content needs tools to help develop content maybe a validation suite to validate against qti standards service and tools conversion tools - vle to moodle (fe) moodle doesn't take qti - coleg devloping a conversion tool OU may have been investigating this hosting and maintaining this - service - legal issues very preacious business - no commercial input tools or people based service institutional or desktop tool developments to service - jisc approach timeline for jisc to support but eventually would need to be freestanding once is mature - may not be needed proof of concept idea business model - partners urgency - confidence from validation there is a conversion tool for developers converting qti1 -2.0 getting qti into non qti sytem is more challenging can run the software on questions that will fit into, user requirements stuff within quiz functions in vle's want to export and make qti switching vle's content packaging did this for LO's ???? do we need more content? not made here systems not the content content as illustration exemplar content needs tools to help develop content maybe a validation suite to validate against qti standards service and tools conversion tools - vle to moodle (fe) moodle doesn't take qti - coleg devloping a conversion tool OU may have been investigating this hosting and maintaining this - service - legal issues very preacious business - no commercial input tools or people based service institutional or desktop tool developments to service - jisc approach timeline for jisc to support but eventually would need to be freestanding once is mature - may not be needed proof of concept idea business model - partners urgency - confidence from validation there is a conversion tool for developers converting qti1 -2.0 getting qti into non qti sytem is more challenging can run the software on questions that will fit into